Sponsored By

Lordstown Explains How it Made In-Wheel EV Motors Work

Giving each wheel its own electric motor is a longtime dream, but Lordstown is building trucks with them now.

Dan Carney, Senior Editor

October 19, 2022

5 Min Read
Elaphe wheel motor.png
The Elaphe in-wheel motor design employed by Lordstown Motors.Image courtesy of Elaphe

EV startup Lordstown Motors says that it has commenced production of its Endurance commercial pickup trucks. While these vehicles are conventional in some respects, with a leaf-spring solid rear axle, for example, the Endurance claims to be the world’s first production EV employing electric motors mounted individually inside each of the vehicle’s wheels.

This eliminates any intermediate drivetrain parts such as differentials or gearboxes and the space they occupy. However, four electric motors are heavier than one or two, and this added mass is not carried by the suspension, so it must track up and down over bumps and potholes without the benefit of springs and dampers.

The challenge of building and packaging motors inside wheels and making them live with the harsh environment that unsprung components endure has prevented others from achieving this goal, so Design News chatted with Lordstown vice president of engineering, Darren Post, at the annual North American Car of the Year jury gathering to hear how his company accomplished the feat.

How did you come to this decision to go with wheel motors for this vehicle?

Darren Post: I think that the vision for this came from our early leadership. At the time they wanted to do something different, where we had a much simpler powertrain orientation that had the lowest cost of ownership.

Related:Lordstown Motors Starts Production of Electric Pickup Trucks

They had been always interested in wheel motors and back when I first started, they said, “Darren, would you come aboard? Let's help bring this into the marketplace.” Because they really thought this could be a game-changer in the industry.

We've heard about wheel motors for a while, and they haven't come to fruition until now. What were some of the challenges and how did you overcome them to your satisfaction to bring it to production?

Post: Yes. So when I looked at some of the earlier wheel motors, like the Protean motors, they had their inverter inside of the motor itself. I never liked the power electronics getting direct G forces from unsprung hits on the ground.  Plus, it also limited the [size of] the brake package.

We can use any inverter we want because the inverter is not encapsulated in the motor. That allows us to size the motors and brakes properly. We have our own special-sized motor. It's been made slightly larger to have more torque to meet the grading requirements of a full [gross vehicle weight] pickup truck. That's our motor, produced in our plant, unique to us.

The other side that's very critical is the wheel bearing itself. The bearing not only bears the weight of the mass of the vehicle, but with the right strength, the bearing maintains the rotor-to-stator relationship with the air gap. Our partner company, Elaphe Ltd., had the crux of the technology and was able to help us to develop it to come up with a motor that would work for a pickup truck.

Do they supply components on your motors or in what way are they your partner on that?

Post: They have the original design for the motor itself. We buy our parts from all different companies. They're very good at motor design and had come up with the initial hub motor-stator-rotor design that provides power at the right efficiency and the right torque.

Is that a permanent magnet motor or an induction motor?

Post: It's a permanent magnet motor. The permanent magnets are on the rotor which is spinning on the outside of the stator and then that's what the actual wheel is attached to

Is that a licensing agreement that you have with them for their technology?

Post: It is essentially a licensing agreement for our version of the hub motor. So that's a plus for us as well as we potentially do other projects.  Both companies share in the success.

One of the perceived obstacles for wheel motors is unsprung mass. What did you find to be the case as you were developing this?

Post: The [importance of] unsprung mass depends on what the overall mass of the vehicle is. So, the motor hub motor as a percentage of the total unsprung mass of the vehicle.  Is it in the sweet spot of what you would see with a bigger corner like a [Ford] F-250 or F-350? So, we do have good tuning capability and we were able to manage right and handling quite well because of the overall mass relationship to the motor mass.

How do you package friction brakes with your hub motors?

Post: The hub motors actually go over the brake of the traditional brake rotor and caliper. When the hub motor comes off, you can see the traditional brake caliper. With regenerative braking, especially with one-pedal driving, you have much longer [brake] pad life.

Have you found manufacturing to be harder or easier because of the in-wheel motors?

Post:  Everything is different. It's easier in that you don't have a gearbox with all the brackets and half-shafts and U -joints and the whole chain isn't there. So, I think it's easier to build than a traditional EV in that sense.

I think also, typically, there's a lot more [noise, vibration, and harshness] from the gearbox. In my experience [other manufacturers] had to actually encapsulate the gearbox and motor because it's very close for the noise coming into the cabin.

Where are the opportunities to improve on today’s design?

Post: We've always got a path of continuous improvement to improve efficiencies. So we are considering some changes to further improve the thermal characteristics and to actually transmit more of the energy into torque. We have some changes we're looking at doing in the near term for that.

About the Author

Dan Carney

Senior Editor, Design News

Dan’s coverage of the auto industry over three decades has taken him to the racetracks, automotive engineering centers, vehicle simulators, wind tunnels, and crash-test labs of the world.

A member of the North American Car, Truck, and Utility of the Year jury, Dan also contributes car reviews to Popular Science magazine, serves on the International Engine of the Year jury, and has judged the collegiate Formula SAE competition.

Dan is a winner of the International Motor Press Association's Ken Purdy Award for automotive writing, as well as the National Motorsports Press Association's award for magazine writing and the Washington Automotive Press Association's Golden Quill award.

He has held a Sports Car Club of America racing license since 1991, is an SCCA National race winner, two-time SCCA Runoffs competitor in Formula F, and an Old Dominion Region Driver of the Year award winner. Co-drove a Ford Focus 1.0-liter EcoBoost to 16 Federation Internationale de l’Automobile-accredited world speed records over distances from just under 1km to over 4,104km at the CERAM test circuit in Mortefontaine, France.

He was also a longtime contributor to the Society of Automotive Engineers' Automotive Engineering International magazine.

He specializes in analyzing technical developments, particularly in the areas of motorsports, efficiency, and safety.

He has been published in The New York Times, NBC News, Motor Trend, Popular Mechanics, The Washington Post, Hagerty, AutoTrader.com, Maxim, RaceCar Engineering, AutoWeek, Virginia Living, and others.

Dan has authored books on the Honda S2000 and Dodge Viper sports cars and contributed automotive content to the consumer finance book, Fight For Your Money.

He is a member and past president of the Washington Automotive Press Association and is a member of the Society of Automotive Engineers

Sign up for the Weekly Current newsletter.

You May Also Like