November 30, 2022
The automotive electrification wave is not only reaching commercial vehicles but military vehicles too. The use of more onboard electronics and electric systems in military ground vehicles translates to a larger electrical load that is testing the performance capabilities of traditional lead-acid batteries. Therefore, the US armed forces are assessing the use of alternative battery technologies for future military applications.
Military operational requirements
In the past, batteries were only use for starting, lighting, and ignition (SLI) functions but in military operations such as ‘silent watch’—high-risk operations that bring a vehicle and a team of soldiers close to their target to gather intelligence—batteries also provide engine-off power to a vehicle’s electrical equipment for long periods when they are regularly deep-discharged.
Many military ground vehicles implement separate batteries for silent-watch operations and SLI functions, but often the same battery chemistry is used. The NATO 6T battery format (10.5 in. × 10 in. × 8.5 in.) is the most common battery used in military vehicles around the world, and it can employ either a 12V or a 24V electrical system.
Vehicle battery technologies must also be able to operate under harsh environmental conditions (e.g., extreme temperatures, high vibration, high impact, dust, dirt, and moisture). Since it is easier to start an engine in a warm environment than in a cold one; batteries must be able to meet cold cranking requirements. In other words, batteries must meet Cold Cranking Amps (CCA) levels. CCA levels measure the number of amps produced by a charged battery over 30 seconds at zero degrees Fahrenheit without dropping below 7.2 volts.
Ideally, the most suitable battery technologies for military vehicles might be those that can be used as drop-in replacement for traditional lead-acid 6T batteries in military ground vehicles to avoid any additional modification to install such a replacement. There are many battery chemistries that could have a great impact in the development of better battery performance for military applications but let’s delve into the benefits that lithium batteries can offer now and in the foreseeable future.
The potential of lithium batteries for military vehicles
The use of Li-ion batteries on military vehicles is attractive because they can power electronic equipment for longer periods of time and they can weigh less and occupy less space than lead-acid or nickel-based batteries.
Drop-in replacement Li-ion batteries have been developed to replace 12V lead-acid SLI batteries in ground vehicles. These batteries make use of the lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cathode material or lithium titanate (LTO) anode material and typically include inbuilt electronics to manage charging/discharging, temperature, and safety.
Lithium iron phosphate (LFP):
The LFP cathode material—chemical formula LiFePO4—is significantly more stable than other Li-ion cathode materials, which means the battery is inherently safer and has a greater resistance to thermal runaway. LFP batteries also do not use expensive metals such as cobalt, nickel, and manganese. Therefore, their cost is lower. The cells of LFP batteries have a lower nominal voltage (3.3V), though it is still higher than lead-acid batteries.
When compare with lead-acid batteries, LFP batteries increase energy by three to five times for a battery of equivalent weight and two to three times for a battery of equivalent volume. If LFP batteries are used to replace lead-acid batteries in military ground vehicles, LFP batteries can provide greater silent-watch endurance and weight savings, which is likely to reduce fuel consumption since the engine would need to be used to charge the batteries less often.
Lithium titanate (LTO):
This battery uses a lithium titanate anode—chemical formula Li4Ti5O12—instead of graphite, and a manganese-based anode. LTO batteries are commercially available, and they have great potential as a drop-in replacement for lead-acid batteries in military ground vehicles.
LTO batteries can improve the safety of ground vehicles (compared to traditional Li-ion batteries) and have high cycle life. Since they are free of oxides of nickel, manganese, aluminum, or cobalt they are not prone to thermal-runaway battery fires. In terms of cycle life, LTO batteries are capable of deep-discharge cycles of over 4000 cycles, which would result in reductions in battery replacement if they were used on military ground vehicles.
Commercial Li-ion drop-in replacements
Several companies already offer drop-in replacement Li-ion batteries for military vehicles, including Epsilor, and Saft. Toshiba is offering LTO (SCiB branded) batteries suitable as a replacement for lead-acid batteries but only for passenger cars and commercial vehicles.
Saft's Xcelion 6T battery.
Advances in lithium-ion battery technologies will soon eliminate the need to worry about adding extra features such as sensors, jammers, communications, controls, drives, optics, or powered weapons systems to military ground vehicles.
About the Author(s)
You May Also Like